INFLUENCE OF HIGH-DOSE ATORVASTATIN ON BILE ACID METABOLISM IN MICE WITH LIVER INJURY AND RELATED MECHANISM

XIA Feifei, SONG Bingxue, SONG Yuqing, TIAN Jiawei, YAN Hui, HUANG Yuxiao, XIN Hui, LIANG Hui

PDF(1037 KB)

JOURNAL OF PRECISION MEDICINE ›› 2023, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (5) : 383-386. DOI: 10.13362/j.jpmed.202305002

INFLUENCE OF HIGH-DOSE ATORVASTATIN ON BILE ACID METABOLISM IN MICE WITH LIVER INJURY AND RELATED MECHANISM

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To investigate the influence of high-dose atorvastatin on bile acid metabolism in mice with liver injury and its mechanism. Methods A total of 40 specific pathogen-free male C57BL/6 mice were randomly divided into normal saline group (group A) and low-, middle-, and high-dose atorvastatin groups (groups B, C, and D, respectively), with 10 mice in each group. After 30 days of intragastric administration of normal saline and atorvastatin at a dose of 10, 20, and 30 mg/kg, respectively, orbital blood was collected from the mice in each group, and these groups were compared in terms of the serum levels of total bile acid (TBA), endotoxin (ET), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT); after liver tissue samples were collected, HE staining was performed to observe the pathological changes of liver tissue, and PCR was used to measure the mRNA expression levels of the bile acid metabolism-related genes farnesoid X receptor (FXR) and multidrug resis-tance-associated protein 2 (MRP2) in liver tissue. Results The mice in group D had slight swelling, sporadic inflammatory cell infiltration, and feather-like degeneration in liver tissue. Compared with the other groups, group D had significant increases in the serum levels of TBA, ET, AST, and ALT (P<0.05). Compared with group A, groups C and D had significant reductions in the relative mRNA expression levels of FXR and MRP2 in liver tissue (P<0.05), and compared with group B, group D had significant reductions in the relative mRNA expression levels of FXR and MRP2 in liver tissue (P<0.05). Conclusion Atorvastatin can induce the increase in serum TBA level in mice and lead to changes in the expression of the downstream FXR and MRP2 genes associated with bile acid metabolism in liver tissue, and abnormal bile acid metabolism in liver tissue caused by high-dose administration may be one of the main causes of atorvastatin hepatotoxicity.

Key words

Atorvastatin ; Chemical and drug induced liver injury ; Bile acid ; Metabolism ; Gene expression

Cite this article

Download Citations
XIA Feifei , SONG Bingxue , SONG Yuqing , TIAN Jiawei , YAN Hui , HUANG Yuxiao , XIN Hui , LIANG Hui. INFLUENCE OF HIGH-DOSE ATORVASTATIN ON BILE ACID METABOLISM IN MICE WITH LIVER INJURY AND RELATED MECHANISM. JOURNAL OF PRECISION MEDICINE. 2023, 38(5): 383-386 https://doi.org/10.13362/j.jpmed.202305002
心血管疾病作为全球重大的公共卫生问题,是全世界50岁及以上人口的第一大疾病[1],而他汀类药物被广泛用于血脂代谢以及心血管疾病的防治当中[2-3]。研究表明,他汀类药物在使用后会出现血清转氨酶不同程度升高的肝损伤表现[4-9],这种药物性肝损伤可能与他汀类药物长时间使用导致的胆汁淤积有关[10]。胆汁淤积与胆汁酸代谢异常有关,胆汁酸作为致炎因子,其大量蓄积后将直接激活炎症递质损害肝细胞,引起肝损伤[11]。因此探究他汀类药物对肝脏胆汁酸代谢的影响可为他汀类药物致肝损伤机制的研究提供一定思路。本研究采用阿托伐他汀建立肝损伤小鼠模型,通过对比不同剂量阿托伐他汀诱导的肝损伤小鼠胆汁酸代谢情况,探讨阿托伐他汀影响胆汁酸代谢的相关机制,以指导他汀类药物的临床应用。

1 材料与方法

1.1 实验动物

SPF级雄性C57BL/6小鼠40只,购买于青岛大任富城畜牧有限公司(动物合格证号SCXK[鲁]20140007),体质量(22.50±1.50)g。小鼠自由进食和饮水,环境湿度为42%~52%,环境温度22~24 ℃,12/12 h交替光照。

1.2 实验材料

阿托伐他汀药物购自于石药集团欧意药业有限公司(国药准字号H20103151),RNAiso plus Trizol(货号9109)、反转录试剂盒(货号RR047A)及聚合酶链反应(PCR)试剂盒(货号RR820A)购自于日本TaKaRa公司,FXRMRP2的上、下游引物购自苏州金唯智生物科技公司,总胆汁酸(TBA)、内毒素(ET)、天冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)、丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)等的ELISA试剂盒购自上海恪敏生物科技有限公司。

1.3 实验方法

1.3.1 分组及处理

C57BL/6小鼠适应性地喂养1周后,随机分为对照组(A组)及阿托伐他汀低、中、高剂量组(B、C、D组),每组10只。A组小鼠每日给予0.5 mL生理盐水灌胃1次,B、C、D组每日分别给予10、20、30 mg/kg阿托伐他汀溶液灌胃1次,各组小鼠饲养环境及条件相同[12-13],连续灌胃给药30 d。

1.3.2 检测指标

灌胃30 d后,4组小鼠均于麻醉后采集眼眶血1.2 mL,置于室温下自然凝固10~20 min,以2 000~3 000 r/min离心20 min,收集上清液,严格按照ELISA试剂盒要求的操作步骤进行血清TBA、ET、AST、ALT指标的检测。采血完成后断颈处死所有小鼠,称量每只小鼠的肝组织与体质量,计算两者比值即肝质量指数。所有小鼠均取部分肝脏组织,固定后送至病理科进行石蜡包埋、切片,并行HE染色,光学显微镜下观察组织病理变化情况。取适量各组小鼠肝脏组织加入Trizol提取总RNA,使用紫外分光光度计测定RNA浓度,采用逆转录试剂盒将其逆转录为cDNA;分别取各组小鼠cDNA样本以及FXRMRP2的上游和下游引物(FXR的上游引物为5'-GCACGCTGATCAG-ACAGCTA-3',下游引物为5'-CAGGAGGGTCTG-TTGGTCTG-3',MRP的上游引物为5'-AATAC-ATGACCTTTTGGTGTTTCTG-3',下游引物为5'-ACGAAACCGATCAGCAACTT-3'),按照PCR试剂盒说明书要求的步骤进行实时荧光定量PCR(RT-qPCR)法检测,并通过2-△△CT法计算FXRMRP2的相对表达量,实验重复3次,结果取均值。

1.4 统计学方法

使用SPSS 20.0软件进行统计学处理,计量资料以 x-±s表示,多组间比较采用单因素方差分析,两组间比较采用SNK-q法,以P<0.05为差异具有统计学意义。

2 结果

2.1 各组小鼠体质量、肝质量指数以及肝组织HE染色结果

A~D组小鼠的体质量分别为(31.50±1.20)、(31.40±1.10)、(31.20±0.90)和(30.80±1.00)g,肝质量指数分别为0.45±0.10、0.46±0.11、0.48±0.10和0.47±0.09,B、C、D组小鼠体质量及肝质量指数与A组比较差异无显著性(P>0.05)。HE染色结果示A、B、C组小鼠肝脏无明显病理改变,但D组小鼠部分肝细胞可见轻微肿大样改变,有散在炎症细胞浸润和羽毛样变性情况(图1)。
图1 各组小鼠肝组织HE染色结果

A~C:A~C组小鼠肝脏组织细胞均无明显病理改变,D:D组小鼠肝组织细胞可见轻微肿大样改变(黄圈内)、散在炎症细胞浸润(红圈内)和羽毛样变性情况(绿圈内)。HE染色,200倍

Full size|PPT slide

2.2 各组小鼠血清TBA、ET、AST、ALT水平比较

4组小鼠血清TBA、ET、AST、ALT水平比较差异有显著性(F=11.19~22.84,P<0.05);与其他组相比,D组小鼠血清TBA、ET、AST、ALT水平均显著升高(P<0.05)。见表1
表1 各组小鼠血清TBA、ET、AST、ALT比较(n=10, x-±s)
组别 血清TBA
(c/μmol·L-1)
血清ET
(c/U·L-1)
血清AST
(z/μg·L-1)
血清ALT
(z/μg·L-1)
A组 6.10±0.22 0.17±0.05 65.96±8.47 50.02±1.02
B组 6.47±0.35 0.20±0.06 67.46±7.41 52.14±3.23
C组 6.96±0.41 0.23±0.04 72.01±6.21 54.25±3.13
D组 8.12±1.02 0.45±0.12 101.01±8.51 63.45±3.45

2.3 各组小鼠肝组织中FXRMRP2基因相对表达量比较

A~D组小鼠的肝组织中FXR基因的相对表达量分别为0.16±0.03、0.15±0.03、0.11±0.02以及0.09±0.02,MRP2基因的相对表达量分别为0.21±0.05、0.20±0.06、0.13±0.03和0.11±0.02。4组小鼠肝组织中FXRMRP2基因相对表达量比较差异有显著性(F=7.28、6.69,P<0.05);与A组相比,C、D组小鼠肝组织中FXRMRP2基因相对表达量显著降低(P<0.05);与B组相比,D组小鼠肝组织中FXRMRP2基因相对表达量显著降低(P<0.05),C、D组间小鼠肝组织中FXRMRP2基因相对表达量差异无统计学意义。

3 讨论

他汀类药物所带来的肝脏毒性是近年来心血管药物领域临床研究的热点,研究表明长时间使用他汀类药物可能会导致肝细胞膜结构变化,引起肝酶渗漏及血液中肝酶升高[14]。但也有相关研究指出阿托伐他汀可显著降低血液中ALT和AST水平,减轻肝损伤[15]。目前关于阿托伐他汀导致血清肝酶变化的机制并无确切定论,其主要机制包括细胞蛋白损害、氧化应激、炎症反应、免疫反应等[16],但关于其肝损伤机制报道却较少,具体发病机制也尚不明确。有报道称,他汀类药物导致的血清肝酶升高仅仅表现为短暂的、无症状的升高,且通常不会超过正常上限的3倍[17]。另有研究指出,他汀类药物可能通过介导肝细胞的异常代谢导致胆汁淤积性肝损害[18],即药物引起肝细胞胆管侧膜或肝细胞窦状隙膜上转运体表达减少、功能障碍,或者抑制胆汁酸及胆盐排泄相关转运蛋白活性,导致胆管与转运蛋白损伤[19-20]
人体内胆汁酸代谢通常处于平衡状态,一旦其代谢紊乱,将导致胆汁形成或流动障碍,最终导致肝细胞损伤、肝纤维化甚至肝硬化[21]。有研究表明,胆汁酸代谢过程中还会引起肝细胞肿大、肝细胞内脂质堆积及肝脏体积增大等严重肝损害[22]。本研究为观察阿托伐他汀的肝毒性,参考阿托伐他汀致其他类型肝损伤的动物实验方法设置了低、中、高三种剂量组[12-13],结果显示各组小鼠灌胃30 d后的体质量及肝质量指数比较均无明显差异,但病理组织HE染色显示,D组小鼠肝组织存在散在炎症细胞及轻微羽毛样变性,此类改变为胆汁淤积导致肝损伤的特征性病理变化,表明大剂量阿托伐他汀的使用会引起胆汁淤积,诱发肝损伤。在此基础上,D组小鼠血清TBA、ET、ALT、AST水平与A、B、C组比较均显著增高,这同样提示了大剂量阿托伐他汀带来的胆汁淤积可能造成的肝损伤,而血清ALT及AST增高则可能为他汀类药物引起的短暂的、无症状升高[17]。有研究指出阿托伐他汀可以通过其抗炎及抗氧化作用减少ET的产生[23],然而本研究中随着阿托伐他汀剂量增加,血清ET水平却表现为增高,提示阿托伐他汀可能通过不同的途径影响ET产生,但两者之间的影响机制还需要进一步实验探究。
既往有研究表明,阿托伐他汀及其代谢产物与肝细胞胆管侧膜上胆汁相关转运蛋白之间联系密切[24]。大剂量使用阿托伐他汀后引发的胆汁淤积可能是由于药物改变或抑制了FXR蛋白对肝细胞胆管侧膜上胆汁相关转运蛋白的调节,从而引起大量胆汁淤积,诱发肝损伤[25-26]。本研究比较了各组小鼠的FXR基因以及其下游MRP2基因的相对表达量,结果显示与A组相比,C、D组小鼠肝组织中FXRMRP2基因表达量显著减少;与B组相比,D组小鼠肝组织中FXRMRP2基因表达量显著减少;说明随着阿托伐他汀的剂量增加,其对肝组织中FXRMRP2基因表达的抑制效果愈加明显。该结果进一步说明了在阿托伐他汀的使用过程中FXR基因及其下游MRP2基因的变化趋势是相同的,且阿托伐他汀对胆汁酸代谢的抑制机制可能是其导致胆汁酸代谢异常、胆汁淤积,进而引起肝损伤的主要原因之一。但本研究中随着阿托伐他汀剂量的增加,C、D组小鼠肝组织中FXRMRP2基因表达并无差异,提示我们实验中阿托伐他汀药物浓度梯度设定可能较窄,后期我们将会通过加大样本量和设置更多浓度梯度进行进一步实验。
总之,阿托伐他汀可诱导小鼠血清中TBA水平升高,并且导致胆汁酸代谢下游相关基因FXRMRP2表达改变,大剂量给药导致的胆汁酸代谢异常可能是阿托伐他汀肝脏毒性的主要原因之一。
伦理批准和动物权利声明:本研究涉及的所有动物实验均已通过青岛大学附属医院医学伦理委员会的审核批准(文件号QYFYWZLL-27294)。所有实验过程均遵照动物实验的“3R”原则及《关于善待实验动物的指导性意见》的条例进行。
作者声明:夏斐斐、宋冰雪、宋雨晴、辛辉、梁惠参与了研究设计;夏斐斐、宋冰雪、田嘉伟、闫慧、黄玉晓参与了论文的写作和修改。所有作者均阅读并同意发表该论文,且均声明不存在利益冲突。

References

[1]
BELTRÁN ROMERO L M, VALLEJO-VAZ A J, MUÑIZ GRIJALVO O. Cerebrovascular disease and statins[J]. Front Cardiovasc Med, 2021, 8:778740.
Elevated low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) is a causal factor for the development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD); accordingly, LDL-C lowering is associated with a decreased risk of progression of atherosclerotic plaques and development of complications. Currently, statins play a central role in any ASCVD management and prevention strategies, in relation to their lipid-lowering action and potentially to pleiotropic effects. After coronary artery disease, stroke is the most frequent cause of ASCVD mortality and the leading cause of acquired disability, a major public health problem. There is often a tendency to aggregate all types of stroke (atherothrombotic, cardioembolic, and haemorrhagic), which have, however, different causes and pathophysiology, what may lead to bias when interpreting the results of the studies. Survivors of a first atherothrombotic ischemic stroke are at high risk for coronary events, recurrent stroke, and vascular death. Although epidemiological studies show a weak relationship between cholesterol levels and cerebrovascular disease as a whole compared with other ASCVD types, statin intervention studies have demonstrated a decrease in the risk of stroke in patients with atherosclerosis of other territories and a decrease in all cardiovascular events in patients who have had a stroke. The Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) trial demonstrated the benefit of high doses of atorvastatin in the secondary prevention of ischemic stroke. In this review, we discuss the evidence, use and recommendations of statins in the primary and secondary prevention of stroke, and their role in other scenarios such as the acute phase of ischemic stroke, cerebral hemorrhage, cardioembolic stroke, small vessel disease, and cognitive impairment.
[2]
PRICE J C, TIEN P C. Editorial: Statins and liver disease: Is it time to recommend statins to prevent liver disease progression?[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2017, 112(10):1506-1507.
Evidence is emerging that statins may reduce liver-related adverse outcomes in individuals with chronic liver disease. In this issue of the American Journal of Gastroenterology, Kamal et al. found in their meta-analysis that statin use was associated with a reduced risk of fibrosis progression, decompensated cirrhosis, and mortality. These encouraging findings suggest beneficial liver effects of statins. However, the overall quality of the evidence is low because 9 of the 10 studies included in the meta-analysis were observational. More robust studies, including randomized trials and research on safety in patients with advanced liver disease, are needed before statins can be routinely recommended for prevention of liver-related morbidity and mortality.
[3]
朱纪斌. 阿托伐他汀所致不良反应及临床合理用药分析[J]. 中国医药科学, 2019, 9(9):71-73.
[4]
YU M L, LIU M X, LUO J, et al. Liver injury induced by statins combined with anti-tuberculosis drugs in rats[J]. Pcar, 2019, 19(2):98-110.
[5]
LICATA A, GIAMMANCO A, MINISSALE M G, et al. Liver and statins: A critical appraisal of the evidence[J]. Curr Med Chem, 2018, 25(42):5835-5846.
Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) represent an important cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Statins are a class of drugs whose main adverse effects are drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and myopathy. Some of these may be predictable, due to their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, while others, unfortunately, are idiosyncratic. Genetic factors may also influence patient susceptibility to DILI and myopathy in the case of statins. This review will first discuss the role of statins in cardiovascular disease treatment and prevention and the underlying mechanisms of action. Furthermore, to explore the susceptibility of statin-induced adverse events such as myopathy and hepatotoxicity, it will then focus on the recent Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) concerning the transporter genes, Cytochrome P450 (CYP), organic anion-transporting polypeptide (OATP) and ABCB1 and ABCC1, which seem to play a role in the development of clinically relevant adverse events. Finally, we appraise the evidence for and against the use of statins in metabolic syndrome and in HCV-infected patients, in terms of their safety and efficacy in cardiovascular events.Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.
[6]
付俣萧, 黄旭, 吕童, 等. 阿托伐他汀在致死型约氏疟原虫感染的肝脏病理损伤中的作用研究[J]. 中国免疫学杂志, 2019, 35(9):1042-1046.
[7]
王可欣. 阿托伐他汀对阿霉素致大鼠肝脏损伤的保护作用及其机制研究[D]. 石家庄: 河北医科大学, 2018.
[8]
苏萍, 陈影, 张广平, 等. 阿托伐他汀的肝毒性机制研究[J]. 药物评价研究, 2019, 42(11):2174-2179.
[9]
于红红, 高晓燕. 护肝片对药物性肝损伤的防治作用[J]. 中国现代应用药学, 2019, 36(18):2271-2274.
[10]
喻明丽, 陈洁, 陈永刚, 等. 他汀类药物致肝损伤的生化特征[J]. 昆明医科大学学报, 2018, 39(8):13-17.
[11]
宋佳, 王春霞, 张育才. 肝损伤新型生物学标记物的研究进展[J]. 中国小儿急救医学, 2019, 26(7):523-526.
[12]
FARAG M M, MOHAMED M B, YOUSSEF E A. Assessment of hepatic function, oxidant/antioxidant status, and histopathological changes in rats treated with atorvastatin: Effect of dose and acute intoxication with acetaminophen[J]. Hum Exp Toxicol, 2015, 34(8):828-837.
A major disadvantage that may occur in association with atorvastatin (ATV) therapy is elevation of serum transaminases. This study was designed to evaluate the effects of treatment of rats with various doses of ATV (2, 5, and 10 mg/kg/day) on liver function, oxidative stress, and histology and on the severity of acetaminophen (APAP) hepatotoxicity. ATV administration for 21 days resulted in a dose-dependent significant rise in serum activities of alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, and alanine aminotransferase. Only ATV at 10 mg/kg/day decreased reduced glutathione (GSH) levels and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, increased malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, and elicited histopathological changes in the liver. In rats challenged with APAP (500 mg/kg), the livers showed centrilobular necrosis with evident oxidative stress and liver dysfunction after 24 h. Rats challenged with APAP after pretreatment with ATV 2 or 5 mg/kg/day showed significantly lower activities of serum enzymes, higher hepatic GSH levels and SOD activities, lower MDA levels and milder histopathological changes compared with rats challenged with APAP after pretreatment with ATV 10 mg/kg/day or without drug pretreatment. In conclusion, the effect of ATV on the liver is dose dependent. Our results showed that ATV, at the highest dose used, induced hepatic lipid peroxidation and injury, suggesting a role for oxidative stress in ATV-induced hepatotoxicity. However, lower doses of ATV attenuated APAP-induced hepatotoxicity via a mechanism related, at least in part, to a reduction of APAP-induced hepatic oxidative stress. These results are of practical interest as both drugs may be used concurrently in clinical practice. © The Author(s) 2014.
[13]
MOTAWI T K, TELEB Z A, EL-BOGHDADY N A, et al. Effect of simvastatin and naringenin coadministration on rat liver DNA fragmentation and cytochrome P450 activity: An in vivo and in vitro study[J]. J Physiol Biochem, 2014, 70(1):225-237.
[14]
KARAHALIL B, HARE E, KOÇXE; G, et al. Hepatotoxicity associated with statins[J]. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol, 2017, 68(4):254-260.
Treatment with statins is known all over the world. They are generally considered safe at therapeutic doses. Nevertheless, clinical trials are not enough to assess their scarce adverse effects such as idiosyncratic drug induced liver injury (DILI). Due to some conditions, such as concomitant usage (drug-drug interaction using an identical metabolising enzyme) and genetic polymorphisms, there is an increasing concern about their safety. Hepatotoxicity and rhabdomyolysis have begun to appear in published studies. Most of investigations have focused on both these adverse effects and mechanisms of drug induced toxicity. The present review has attempted to compile almost all of the existing studies on the hepatotoxicity of statins but not rhabdomyolysis. The aim of our study is to provide an overview of the studies on the statin-associated hepatotoxicity and to discuss the published studies. The researchers are of the opinion that the research on this topic is incomplete but extremely necessary.
[15]
WANG J Q, LI L L, HU A, et al. Inhibition of ASGR1 decreases lipid levels by promoting cholesterol excretion[J]. Nature, 2022, 608(7922):413-420.
[16]
吴军. 他汀类药物临床多效性研究进展[J]. 药品评价, 2020, 17(1):24-25,53.
[17]
SAHA A, GARG A. Severe liver injury associated with high-dose atorvastatin therapy[J]. J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep, 2021, 9:23247096211014050.
[18]
陈步宽. 他汀类药物致肝损伤临床特点及影响因素分析[J]. 肝脏, 2017, 22(10):885-887,903.
[19]
TRAUNER M, FUCHS C D, HALILBASIC E, et al. New therapeutic concepts in bile acid transport and signaling for management of cholestasis[J]. Hepatology, 2017, 65(4):1393-1404.
The identification of the key regulators of bile acid (BA) synthesis and transport within the enterohepatic circulation has revealed potential targets for pharmacological therapies of cholestatic liver diseases. Novel drug targets include the bile BA receptors, farnesoid X receptor and TGR5, the BA-induced gut hormones, fibroblast growth factor 19 and glucagon-like peptide 1, and the BA transport systems, apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter and Na -taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide, within the enterohepatic circulation. Moreover, BA derivatives undergoing cholehepatic shunting may allow improved targeting to the bile ducts. This review focuses on the pathophysiological basis, mechanisms of action, and clinical development of novel pharmacological strategies targeting BA transport and signaling in cholestatic liver diseases. (Hepatology 2017;65:1393-1404).© 2016 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.
[20]
KIM K H, CHOI J M, LI F, et al. Xenobiotic nuclear receptor signaling determines molecular pathogenesis of progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis[J]. Endocrinology, 2018, 159(6):2435-2446.
Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) is a genetically heterogeneous disorder of bile flow disruption due to abnormal canalicular transport or impaired bile acid (BA) metabolism, causing excess BA accumulation and liver failure. We previously reported an intrahepatic cholestasis mouse model based on loss of function of both farnesoid X receptor (FXR; NR1H4) and a small heterodimer partner (SHP; NR0B2) [double knockout (DKO)], which has strong similarities to human PFIC5. We compared the pathogenesis of DKO livers with that of another intrahepatic cholestasis model, Bsep-/-, which represents human PFIC2. Both models exhibit severe hepatomegaly and hepatic BA accumulation, but DKO showed greater circulating BA and liver injury, and Bsep-/- had milder phenotypes. Molecular profiling of BAs uncovered specific enrichment of cholic acid (CA)-derived BAs in DKO livers but chenodeoxycholate-derived BAs in Bsep-/- livers. Transcriptomic and proteomic analysis revealed specific activation of CA synthesis and alternative basolateral BA transport in DKO but increased chenodeoxycholic acid synthesis and canalicular transport in Bsep-/-. The constitutive androstane receptor (CAR)/pregnane X receptor (PXR)-CYP2B/CYP2C axis is activated in DKO livers but not in other cholestasis models. Loss of this axis in Fxr:Shp:Car:Pxr quadruple knockouts blocked Cyp2b/Cyp2c gene induction, impaired bilirubin conjugation/elimination, and increased liver injury. Differential CYP2B expression in DKO and Bsep-/- was recapitulated in human PFIC5 and PFIC2 livers. In conclusion, loss of FXR/SHP results in distinct molecular pathogenesis and CAR/PXR activation, which promotes Cyp2b/Cyp2c gene transcription and bilirubin clearance. CAR/PXR activation was not observed in Bsep-/- mice or PFIC2 patients. These findings provide a deeper understanding of the heterogeneity of intrahepatic cholestasis.
[21]
WANG Y Q, AOKI H, YANG J, et al. The role of S1PR2 in bile acid-induced cholangiocyte proliferation and cholestasis-induced liver injury in mice: Bile acids, S1PR2 and cholestasis[J]. Hepatology, 2017, 65(6):2005-2018.
Bile duct obstruction is a potent stimulus for cholangiocyte proliferation, especially for large cholangiocytes. Our previous studies reported that conjugated bile acids (CBAs) activate the protein kinase B (AKT) and extracellular signal‐regulated kinase 1 and 2 (ERK1/2) signaling pathways through sphingosine 1‐phosphate receptor (S1PR) 2 in hepatocytes and cholangiocarcinoma cells. It also has been reported that taurocholate (TCA) promotes large cholangiocyte proliferation and protects cholangiocytes from bile duct ligation (BDL)‐induced apoptosis. However, the role of S1PR2 in bile‐acid–mediated cholangiocyte proliferation and cholestatic liver injury has not been elucidated. Here, we report that S1PR2 is the predominant S1PR expressed in cholangiocytes. Both TCA‐ and sphingosine‐1‐phosphate (S1P)‐induced activation of ERK1/2 and AKT were inhibited by JTE‐013, a specific antagonist of S1PR2, in cholangiocytes. In addition, TCA‐ and S1P‐induced cell proliferation and migration were inhibited by JTE‐013 and a specific short hairpin RNA of S1PR2, as well as chemical inhibitors of ERK1/2 and AKT in mouse cholangiocytes. In BDL mice, expression of S1PR2 was up‐regulated in whole liver and cholangiocytes. S1PR2 deficiency significantly reduced BDL‐induced cholangiocyte proliferation and cholestatic injury, as indicated by significant reductions in inflammation and liver fibrosis in S1PR2 knockout mice. Treatment of BDL mice with JTE‐013 significantly reduced total bile acid levels in serum and cholestatic liver injury. Conclusion: This study suggests that CBA‐induced activation of S1PR2‐mediated signaling pathways plays a critical role in obstructive cholestasis and may represent a novel therapeutic target for cholestatic liver diseases. (Hepatology 2017;65:2005‐2018).
[22]
NICOLI E R, HUEBECKER M, SMITH D, et al. Differen-tial response of the liver to bile acid treatment in a mouse mo-del of Niemann-Pick disease type C[J]. Wellcome Open Res, 2017, 2:76.
[23]
MELO A C, SANTOS VALENÇA S, GITIRANA L B, et al. Redox markers and inflammation are differentially affected by atorvastatin, pravastatin or simvastatin administered before endotoxin-induced acute lung injury[J]. Int Immunopharmacol, 2013, 17(1):57-64.
Statins are standard therapy for the treatment of lipid disorders, and the field of redox biology accepts that statins have antioxidant properties. Our aim in this report was to consider the pleiotropic effects of atorvastatin, pravastatin and simvastatin administered prior to endotoxin-induced acute lung injury. Male mice were divided into 5 groups and intraperitoneally injected with LPS (10 mg/kg), LPS plus atorvastatin (10 mg/kg/day; A + LPS group), LPS plus pravastatin (5 mg/kg/day; P + LPS group) or LPS plus simvastatin (20 mg/kg/day; S + LPS group). The control group received saline. All mice were sacrificed one day later. There were fewer leukocytes in the P + LPS and S + LPS groups than in the LPS group. MCP-1 cytokine levels were lower in the P + LPS group, while IL-6 levels were lower in the P + LPS and S + LPS groups. TNF-α was lower in all statin-treated groups. Levels of redox markers (superoxide dismutase and catalase) were lower in the A + LPS group (p < 0.01). The extent of lipid peroxidation (malondialdehyde and hydroperoxides) was reduced in all statin-treated groups (p < 0.05). Myeloperoxidase was lower in the P + LPS group (p < 0.01). Elastance levels were significantly greater in the LPS group compared to the statin groups. Our results suggest that atorvastatin and pravastatin but not simvastatin exhibit anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activity in endotoxin-induced acute lung injury.Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
[24]
康雷, 林孝威, 王国栋, 等. 药物性肝损伤药学实践探索[J]. 中国药师, 2017, 20(11):2025-2029.
[25]
叶晓莉, 王凌, 蒋学华. 茴三硫对利福平致药物性肝损伤的保护作用及机制[J]. 华西药学杂志, 2018, 33(5):501-503.
[26]
李晓玲, 孙凤霞, 王琮, 等. 多药耐药相关蛋白2及其与胆汁淤积的关系研究[J]. 国际流行病学传染病学杂志, 2018, 45(1):48-50.

References

PDF(1037 KB)

2757

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/